News

Housing Bill in Limbo After Congress Passes and President Declines to Sign

June 30, 2026

As we covered last week, the revised 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act (H.R. 6644) passed the Senate by a vote of 85-5 and the House 358-32. 

• However, President Trump abruptly canceled a June 24 signing ceremony and said he would not sign the bill until the Senate passed the SAVE America Act.
• Click here for our previous coverage on the legislation.

Why it matters: Trump was expected to sign the bill, but he posted on social media several times that the bill was written by Democrats and then declined to sign as a pressure tactic on the Senate to pass the election-related legislation. 

• Constitutionally, Trump has 10 days (excluding Sundays) to sign or veto the bill, otherwise it will become law on July 9. The House “presented” the bill to the President on Monday, which started the 10-day clock. 
• President Trump has not threatened to veto the bill. If he did, 2/3 of each chamber would have to vote to override the bill to enact it. 
• While H.R. 6644 passed each chamber above the 2/3 threshold, a veto override would not be guaranteed. Many Republicans would likely balk at overriding the President on this issue. 
  

Go deeper: The bill still contains a section that seeks to ban large institutional investors from owning more than 350 single-family homes.

• Click here for a more detailed analysis of the SFR provision.
• The latest version of the SFR section is unchanged from what the House passed in May. Build-to-rent is intended to be exempt from the ban and it does not include a seven-year divestment mandate.
• While the ban includes several exemptions and is not intended to require large institutional investors to sell their current holdings, industry questions remain about the operational aspects of the law.

Contact David McCarthy (dmccarthy@crefc.org) with questions.

Contact 

News Archive

News

CRE CLO Investor Reporting Update

June 30, 2026

CREFC held a highly engaged, roundtable meeting during the CREFC Annual Conference in New York City to address evolution and standardization across CRE Collateralized Loan Obligation (CRE CLO) reporting. The session, which brought together over 120 market participants, focused on driving enhanced transparency and assessing the structural deployment of CREFC’s Collateral Manager Data Report (CMDR). 

The discussion centered on several critical updates, market adoption metrics, and forward-looking data initiatives:

• Accelerating Adoption of the CMDR: Market implementation of the CMDR has demonstrated industry-wide momentum. Originally launched in October 2025 to introduce a standardized reporting framework for transitional assets, the report has quickly established wide adoption. Multiple collateral managers have chosen to retroactively implement CMDR reporting frameworks for legacy, older-vintage CRE CLO transactions. Currently, over 70% of all CRE CLOs issued since January 2024 are compliant with this reporting standard.
• Industry Feedback Solicitation: While CREFC is highly encouraged by the strong institutional adoption of the CMDR to date, the goal is to make the CREFC CMDR a market standard. To ensure the reporting adapts to changing credit environments, CREFC is actively soliciting industry feedback. Participants who wish to suggest data field refinements, technical modifications, or structural changes to the current report are strongly encouraged to submit their recommendations directly to CREFC.
• Ongoing Dialogue on Servicer Financial Reporting: The roundtable engaged in a detailed discussion regarding methods to improve and accelerate the throughput of property-level financial reporting spread by servicers. While participants did not establish immediate consensus or produce specific document recommendations during the session, the dialogue underscored a shared industry desire for greater data consistency. CREFC remains committed to actively engaging with collateral managers, servicers, and investors over the coming months to develop practical solutions that reduce reporting friction and heighten overall secondary market transparency.
  

Contact 

News Archive

News

Economy, the Fed, and Rates…

June 30, 2026

Economic Data & Labor Market

• May PCE ran hot, but lower energy prices point to June disinflation. Headline PCE rose 4.1% year-over-year (from 3.8%), the fastest since April 2023, while core held firm at 3.4% (from 3.3%); monthly readings were 0.45% headline and 0.32% core. The acceleration was concentrated in services – portfolio-management fees, air transportation, and healthcare drove almost two-thirds of monthly core – while core goods fell 0.1%. With gasoline down more than 60 cents a gallon since the Hormuz scare eased, headline inflation has likely peaked, but the services core is too firm for the Fed to claim progress.
• Consumers keep spending, and the alarming Q1 revision is narrower than it looks. Real spending rose 0.3% in May with the saving rate at 3.0%, and real disposable income turned positive for the first time this year. First-quarter GDP was revised up to 2.1% from 1.6%, but real consumer spending was cut to 0.5% from 1.4% – the weakest since the pandemic. Bloomberg Economics attributes the markdown almost entirely to two idiosyncratic categories (investment advice and Iran-war-related foreign travel) and still expects 2Q real spending to rebound near 2.5%.
• Labor stays firm enough to keep hike risk alive. Bloomberg Economics looks for a 200k June payroll print on Thursday – well above the 113k consensus and a third straight strong report – with unemployment holding at 4.3%. Beneath the headline, May JOLTS openings are seen falling nearly 300k to 7.33 million, a cooler but still above-1.0 vacancy-to-unemployed ratio. A healthy wage number would harden the case for a hike later this year.
• AI is showing up as inflation first – and part of it may be a measurement artifact. Memory-chip scarcity pushed PPI for electronics up 27% in May, and Apple and Microsoft have already raised hardware prices. But Bloomberg Economics estimates that correcting a CPI/PCE definitional mismatch on storage media lowers six-month annualized core PCE by roughly 0.3 point – meaning the Fed’s preferred gauge likely overstates underlying inflation at the margin. The signal: AI capex is adding demand and input-cost pressure now, with the disinflationary payoff still years away.

Federal Reserve Policy

• One month in, markets have so far validated Warsh’s price-stability pivot. Ten-year breakevens have dropped from above 2.5% in mid-May to about 2.2%, the lowest in over a year, and long-end yields have eased even as short rates price hikes – the reduced-guidance regime set at his June debut (shortened statement, no chair dot, an explicit “deliver price stability” pledge) trading forward guidance for inflation-fighting credibility. The open question is how much further he takes it.
• The market prices tightening risk but has trimmed the most aggressive bets. Nine of nineteen policymakers penciled at least one 2026 hike in the June projections, and swaps imply roughly 34 basis points of tightening by December (down from 36 after the PCE relief), with the odds of a July move around one in three. Barkin called inflation “too high” while flagging tariff and oil relief ahead; Kashkari said broad-based pressure led him to pencil one hike, though he is “not in a rush.” The base case is an extended hold unless core cools convincingly.
• Less information flow is itself a risk. Warsh’s skepticism of the dot plot, the SEP, and frequent Fed communication could thin the guidance markets rely on; Bloomberg Economics notes that two-year Treasury repricing has historically run far larger around projection-bearing meetings than statement-only ones, because the SEP conveys real news. Stripping it out widens risk premia and raises the cost of hedging and rate execution for CRE even without a hike.

Treasury Yields & Bond Markets

• Treasuries rallied across the curve, led by the front end. Per the attached Bloomberg table, the 2-year fell to 4.09% (–9 bps), the 10-year to 4.37% (–8 bps), and the 30-year to 4.86% (–4 bps), with the 3-month pinned at 3.74%. Cooler-than-feared PCE, sub-$73 Brent, and trimmed hike bets drove the move.
• Big managers are crowding into the “belly.” Capital Group, Insight Investment, Natixis, Pimco, and PGIM all favor the 5-year area as a compromise between volatile front-end policy risk and long-end fiscal and inflation risk – a maturity that benefits if hike risk fades without taking full duration. The signal is selectivity: investors are positioning for two-sided rate risk rather than buying duration outright.

Dollar, Commodities & Markets

• Oil relief is real but not fully settled. Brent has retraced to the low $70s and traffic is flowing through the Strait of Hormuz, but the US-Iran truce remains fragile – shipping continued even after an attack on a container vessel prompted some owners to review exit plans. The market has moved from crisis pricing to deal-risk pricing; gasoline is down sharply but still roughly a dollar a gallon above pre-war levels.
• The dollar’s driver has shifted from energy to the Fed. JPMorgan, Bank of America, and Goldman have turned constructive, with the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index up about 2% in June on Warsh’s hawkish credibility, US economic resilience, and a widening rate gap as other central banks pause. A firmer dollar restrains some import-price pressure but reinforces tighter global financial conditions.
• Equity leadership is rotating as AI valuations get questioned. The S&P 500 slipped to 7,354 from 7,501 and the Nasdaq to 25,298 from 26,518, while the Dow rose to 51,876 – a rotation out of chipmakers (the semiconductor index fell more than 5% in a single session) into broader cyclicals, with the equal-weighted S&P at a record. The move reflects rising sensitivity to AI infrastructure costs, return timelines, and higher discount rates – the same financial-conditions channel that matters for CRE.
• Freight and tariffs remain live goods-inflation channels. Container rates on Asia-US routes have surged (China to US East Coast up 62% in a month) as importers front-load ahead of a late-July tariff round on roughly 60 countries, and tariff-refund accounting has become an earnings-quality issue for consumer firms. Lower oil helps, but shipping and trade policy keep upward pressure on goods prices and margins.

CRE Finance Market Implications

• Fixed-rate borrowers get relief at the margin, not a reopening. A 10-year at 4.37% and 30-year at 4.86% improve on May’s highs but not enough to materially change refinance math for many 2026–2027 maturities. Debt yields, DSCRs, and exit-cap assumptions stay under pressure, and the long end’s term-premium risk caps how far benchmark costs can fall.
• Floating-rate borrowers still have no SOFR relief. One-month Term SOFR is 3.65%, essentially unchanged from 3.64%, and with the Fed on hold and hike risk alive, bridge and transitional borrowers cannot count on near-term coupon relief. The 3-month bill pinned at 3.74% is the clearest sign that floating costs are stuck until the Fed’s reaction function shifts.
• Rate volatility is now a CRE execution risk in its own right. Thinner Fed guidance, a contested SEP/dot-plot framework, and two-sided front-end pricing raise the odds of abrupt Treasury moves – which matters for CMBS execution, rate locks, loan sizing, hedging costs, and borrower timing as much as the level of rates does. Wider rate uncertainty is a cost even in a no-hike scenario.
• The bright spots stay narrow, and the AI risk channel runs through financial conditions. Construction spending remains concentrated in data centers and power infrastructure while most other residential and nonresidential building stays soft; AI-linked product benefits directly, but the broader risk to CRE runs through higher hurdle rates and compressed margins. 
  

You can download CREFC's one-page MarketMetrics, which includes statistics covering the economy and the CRE debt capital markets, here.

Contact Raj Aidasani (raidasani@crefc.org) with any questions.

Contact 

News Archive