Previous Page  16 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

CRE Finance World Summer 2015

14

Other markets such as Seattle, San Diego, Atlanta, Dallas-Ft.

Worth, Portland, Minneapolis, and Indianapolis exhibit long term

growth attributes in certain categories that suggest consideration

after factoring qualitative factors and overall market position.

Seattle has the fourth highest technology location quotient in the

US, a very high education attainment level, and is considered more

affordable than rival California tech cities. San Diego has an above

average education attainment level and has experienced a high

growth rate in the number of college graduates aged 25 to 34.

Portland is well known for being attractive to young people and

has attracted YCEs and STEM jobs.

Although Atlanta and Dallas-Ft. Worth have had low growth in the

number of college graduates aged 25 to 34, they are affordable

housing markets that have attracted young families in great numbers.

In addition, they have experienced growth in office-using jobs over

the past five years and are expected to do the same over the next

five years. Minneapolis and Indianapolis are the only Midwestern

cities on our list. Minneapolis is notable for its high educational

attainment level and high-tech employment growth. Indianapolis

has had a high level of office-using job growth over the past five

years and is forecast to have above average growth over the next

five years. It is an affordable housing market and has attracted

young families over the past decade.

In addition, Greater Miami, which lagged in many of the considerations,

was included due to its strong projected growth in office-using jobs

and it being a global city with potential for category changing growth.

Many of these metros are being transformed into fundamentally

stronger cities and office markets. Seattle and Miami may catapult

to tier one status over the next 15 to 20 years. Although most of

the smaller markets may remain secondary destinations, they can

nevertheless achieve long term growth and be a source of solid

office building investment returns.

Selecting the appropriate metro is important, but equally as vital is

discerning which CBD or suburban submarket are the most suitable.

Similarly, strategically choosing the right office building within the

preferred submarket is essential.

The metro area considerations detailed above go beyond cyclical

rhythms and do not focus on entry points. We include markets that

we consider to have sustainable growth over the long run. This is not

a total return play and is not reflective of short term profitability

23

.

As is true with all markets, they are subject to cyclicality, overbuilding

and supply/demand imbalance.

The Information presented herein does not involve the rendering of

personalized investment advice, but is limited to the dissemination of

general information on Market conditions. This is an abridged version

of a larger paper that can be found on

http://www.newyorklife.com/

realestateinvestors/. See same link for important disclosures pertaining

to this article. Real Estate Investors is an investment group within NYL

Investors LLC. NYL Investors is a wholly owned subsidiary of New York

Life Insurance Company.

1 The source for the presented Moody’s CPPI data is Tad Philipp, Kevin

Fagan, and Keith Leung, “Moody’s/RCA CPPI: Industrial Leads Price

Gains Over the Last Three and 12 Months l”, March 6, 2015. Data is as

of January 2015.

2 For the purposes of this report young college educated persons are

those between the ages of 25 and 34 as used by City Observatory

http://cityobservatory.org/.

3 Joel Kotkin, “Baby Boomtowns: The U.S. Cities Attracting The Most

Families”, Forbes, September 12 2014.

4 This does not imply that good investments cannot be made in energy

centric markets with the right entry and exit points.

5 Alan Berube as quoted by Sabrina Tavernise, “A Gap in College Gradu-

ates Leaves Some Cities Behind”, New York Times, May 30, 2012.

6 Alan Berube, “Where the Grads Are: Degree Attainment in Metro Areas”,

Brookings.edu

, May 31, 2012.

7 Edward Glaeser, Triumph of the City, Penguin Press, New York, 2013.

8 Alan Berube, “Where the Grads Are: Degree Attainment in Metro Areas

of the City”,

Brookings.edu

, May 31, 2012.

9 Edward Glaeser is an economist at Harvard and the author of “Triumph

of the City”. As quoted by Sabrina Tavernise, “A Gap in College Gradu-

ates Leaves Some Cities Behind”, New York Times, May 30, 2012.

10

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/05/31/us/education-in-

metro-areas.html. Based on the Brookings Institute’s analysis of US

Census American Community Survey data.

11 All the data concerning YCEs is from Joe Cortright, “The Young and

Restless and the Nation’s Cities”, CityReport, October 2014.

12 The reason for this screening mechanism is to highlight metro areas

that have increases over a substantial base.

13 Source: U.S. Census; CoStar Portfolio Strategy.

14 Source: U.S. Census; CoStar Portfolio Strategy. Residents 25+ as of

2010.

Beyond The Big Six: Identifying Alternative Us Office Markets Based On Long Term Demand Generators