FinCEN Beneficial Ownership Database Not Operational in 2022

May 2, 2022

On Thursday, April 28, the House Financial Services Committee held a hearing entitled “Oversight of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)”. FinCEN is a division of the Treasury Department charged with implementing and enforcing various anti-money laundering (AML) laws. The sole witness was FinCEN Acting Director Himamauli "Him" Das.

Overall, the hearing provided little clarity on FinCEN’s timing for implementing the beneficial ownership databased or its specific plans on additional AML regulations in real estate. Members focused their questions on FinCEN’s efforts to implement the Corporate Transparency Act, the volume of and follow-up on Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs), and FinCEN’s overall effectiveness. As a reminder, FinCEN’s mission is to safeguard the financial system from illicit use, combat money laundering, and promote national security through the collection, analysis, and dissemination of financial intelligence and strategic use of financial authorities.

Real Estate in Hearing Testimony, But Limited Discussion
Director Das’s written testimony repeatedly emphasized the agency’s concern over the risk of money laundering in real estate and highlighted an ongoing rulemaking related to illicit finance in real estate:

FinCEN is carefully studying the 150 comments we received in response to the real estate ANPRM. These comments will help us move toward the next step, a proposed rule to address the illicit finance threats to the real estate market. While it is still too early to identify the scope of any NPRM or final rule, we are working to ensure that the requirements would be carefully crafted to result in valuable information for law enforcement, regulators, and the intelligence community, as well as to help the real estate sector protect itself from abuse by corrupt and other bad actors.

However, real estate was barely mentioned at the hearing. Rep. Chuy Garcia (D-IL) briefly raised the issue, but connected the issue of all-cash residential transactions fueled by “kleptocrats” to pricing out working-class families. Garcia provided no evidence for his claim.

As we previously covered, CREFC responded to an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) to urge FinCEN to tailor its real estate proposal to true all-cash transactions rather than capture nonbank CRE finance. Click here to read CREFC’s comment letter.

Beneficial Ownership: Too Much Work; Not Enough Money
Director Das received bipartisan criticism on FinCEN’s slowness to implement nationwide beneficial ownership reporting rules required by the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) repeatedly asked Das for a timeline on implementation. Das said that he hoped to get the second of three rules proposed by yearend, but declined to estimate when the database would be functional. On the other side of the aisle, Ranking Member Patrick McHenry (R-NC) criticized FinCEN’s first CTA proposal as “far too complex, overly broad, and deviated significantly from Congress' intent.”

Das also drew attention to increased budgetary constraints on FinCEN that have limited the agency’s enforcement and rulemaking capabilities (including those to implement the CTA). The Biden administration proposed a $210 million budget for FY 2023, a 31% increase.

Geographic Targeting Orders on Residential Real Estate Expanded
The day after the hearing, FinCEN again extended its Geographic Targeting Orders (GTOs) that require U.S. title insurance companies to identify the natural persons behind shell companies used in all-cash purchases of residential real estate.

FinCEN extended, by six months, the GTOs that cover all-cash purchases of residential real estate in certain counties within the following major U.S. metropolitan areas: Boston, Chicago, Dallas-Fort Worth, Honolulu, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Antonio, San Diego, San Francisco, and Seattle.

FinCEN, working in conjunction with its law enforcement partners, including the FBI, identified additional regions that present greater risks for illicit finance activity through all-cash purchases of residential real estate. Accordingly, FinCEN expanded the geographic coverage of the GTOs to parts of the District of Columbia, Northern Virginia, and Maryland (DMV) metropolitan area, the Hawaiian islands of Maui, Hawaii, and Kauai, and Fairfield County, Connecticut. The purchase amount threshold remains $300,000 for each covered metropolitan area, with the exception of the City and County of Baltimore, where the purchase threshold is $50,000.

 

Contact

David McCarthy
Managing Director, Head of Policy
202.448.0855
dmccarthy@crefc.org
Overall, the hearing provided little clarity on FinCEN’s timing for implementing the beneficial ownership databased or its specific plans on additional AML regulations in real estate.
The information provided herein is general in nature and for educational purposes only. CRE Finance Council makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, validity, usefulness, or suitability of the information provided. The information should not be relied upon or interpreted as legal, financial, tax, accounting, investment, commercial or other advice, and CRE Finance Council disclaims all liability for any such reliance. © 2022 CRE Finance Council. All rights reserved.

Become a Member

CREFC offers industry participants an unparalleled ability to connect, participate, advocate and learn!
Join Now

Sign Up for eNews

Subscribe