Federal Legislation on Data Center and Energy Usage

July 14, 2026

Data center development has become the marquee issue in many communities across the country, and the political nature is beginning to creep into federal legislative efforts. Among the efforts, The House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy advanced legislation on June 24 that would build in cost recovery for large energy users.

Why it matters: The rapid innovation in artificial intelligence and the exploding demand for data centers are creating political incentives for policymakers to push back or take action on voter’s concerns, including demands for water and power. While the issue is largely at the local level, Congress has begun to focus on key issues related to energy consumption. 

The Ratepayer Protection Act (H.R. 9340), would allow the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) to establish a federal standard directing state utility regulators to adopt cost-allocation rules for "large-load customers" (100 MW+ demand) — aimed squarely at AI data centers. 

  • The bill would have state regulators establish recommendations for integrating new large-load customers with 100 MW or more of demand onto the grid. 
  • Key mechanisms: Recovery of the full incremental cost of grid upgrades from the large-load customer over a long period via a special rate charge or similar agreement, protecting ratepayers if that customer later scales down or exits; and financial assurance requirements obligating the large-load customer to fund generation, transmission, or other infrastructure needed to serve its load. 

What they’re saying: Committee members expressed bipartisan support for the bill and many echoed concerns expressed by their constituents. Rep. Paul Tonko (D-NY) said the bill is a good first step, but had concerns the threshold was too high and 50 MW would be more appropriate. 

Yes, but: Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ), the lead Democrat on the full committee, expressed his support for a nationwide moratorium on data centers: 

And that's why I am in favor of a national AI data center moratorium until we can find a way to ensure they don't harm our nation's air, water, and power bills.

Towns in my district are way ahead of this Congress and seeking a moratorium. Asbury Park, Red Bank, Old Bridge, and Sayreville all have taken this bold step. The city of New Brunswick put a stop on a planned data center after the community stood together to oppose the project, and we need to follow in their footsteps here in Congress.

The big picture: Data center and related issues will continue to be a key item on voters and politicians minds as the sector grows. CREFC will continue to monitor federal efforts that impact the asset class. 

Contact David McCarthy (dmccarthy@crefc.org) with questions.

Contact 

David McCarthy
Managing Director,
Chief Lobbyist, Head of Legislative Affairs
202.448.0855
dmccarthy@crefc.org
The information provided herein is general in nature and for educational purposes only. CRE Finance Council makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, validity, usefulness, or suitability of the information provided. The information should not be relied upon or interpreted as legal, financial, tax, accounting, investment, commercial or other advice, and CRE Finance Council disclaims all liability for any such reliance. © 2026 CRE Finance Council. All rights reserved.

Become a Member

CREFC offers industry participants an unparalleled ability to connect, participate, advocate and learn!
Join Now

Sign Up for eNews

Subscribe